Typical first build
2–4 weeks
One process, running in production, with your team trained on it.
AI workflows & automation
We start with the processes you'd never put in a job description — retyping invoices, chasing approvals, rebuilding the same report. Then we automate the ones worth automating.
Typical first build
2–4 weeks
One process, running in production, with your team trained on it.
Where we start
Your inbox
The highest-volume repetition in most SMBs is email-shaped.
What you own
All of it
Your accounts, your data, documented handover. No lock-in.
01
Invoicing, approvals, recurring reports, notifications, data moving between systems that were never meant to talk.
Typical build: 2–4 weeks
02
After-hours customer triage, and internal assistants that answer from your own documents rather than guessing.
Customer-facing · internal
03
Numbers pulled from your systems into one dashboard, with the monthly report assembled before you ask for it.
Dashboards · scheduled reports
04
Lead capture, follow-up sequences, pipeline hygiene, and alerts when a real opportunity goes quiet.
Follow-ups · scoring · pipeline
05
Invoices, contracts, delivery notes and forms read automatically, with anything unusual sent to a human.
Extraction · validation · exceptions
06
Connecting the tools you already pay for. Most automation value is in the gaps between them.
APIs · middleware · handover docs
We automate one process at a time and put it live before starting the next. You see value before the invoice grows.
01
We sit with the person who does the task and time it honestly. Some processes should be deleted, not automated.
02
Hours returned per month, build cost, running cost. If the maths doesn't work we tell you before you commit.
03
The automation runs alongside the manual process until the outputs match for two weeks straight.
04
Documentation, training, and a monitoring plan. You can keep us on retainer or take it in-house.
Case note
Two staff spent the first three days of every month pulling numbers from four systems into a spreadsheet. Now the figures arrive assembled on the 1st, with the exceptions flagged for a human to check.
Roughly 40 hours a month back, and the report is no longer late.
Case note
A firm in the financial sector needed to catch fraudulent applications and transactions more reliably. The constraint that shaped everything: customer data could not leave their own infrastructure. That ruled out sending it to a public AI service, so we designed for deployment inside their perimeter.
We audited how the fraud team actually worked before proposing anything — what they look at, what they miss, and where the time goes. The system that came out of it runs locally: a language model grounded in their own case history and policy documents through retrieval, and tuned on their data, so its judgement reflects their patterns rather than the general internet.
It flags suspicious applications and transactions. The part the team valued most was what happens after the flag — pulling the related records together, surfacing comparable past cases, and drafting the written findings an investigator would otherwise assemble by hand.
Designed for on-premise deployment. No customer data leaves their infrastructure.
We look at three of your recurring processes and estimate the hours each would return. Written up, no commitment.
Request the audit